In Battlefield 6, the Celeron 3965U is much slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 113% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 113% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
