Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 40% better in Battlefield V than Celeron 3965U - 289 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€392.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €392.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3965U | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |