Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3412 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 15 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron 2955U - 284 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 32 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
284
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 2955U | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |