The Celeron 1000M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-3470. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-3470
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-3470 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 1000M
Jan 20th, 2013
Average FPS
164
96%
Min 1% FPS
111
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-3470 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-3470 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-3470 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1000M
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 1000M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $184.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
35 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
