Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 677 days newer than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 20% better in F1 23 than Core i5-10400F - 266 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Buy for €90.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
70.55937193326791%
Multi-Core
5751
35.01583049196298%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Chagall | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |