Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 63 days newer than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G6900 - 148 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Buy for €66.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
78.65554465161924%
Multi-Core
2696
16.415002435460302%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Chagall | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |