Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 4076 days newer than Core i5-2500.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 20% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-2500 - 142 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i5-2500
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Chagall | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
