Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 4571 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 112% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom II X4 830 - 456 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
456
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Chagall | Codename | Deneb |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |