Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 3662 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 27% better in Lost Ark than FX-6200 - 281 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 48 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Chagall | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 3 |
48 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |