Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 3800 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 26% better in Valorant than FX-6100 - 855 vs 678 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 48 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
855
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Chagall | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
