Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2136 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 229 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
