Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2871 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240 - 205 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
34.668335419274094%
Multi-Core
1137
7.667925546263825%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
