Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 245 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-10105F - 190 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €70.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
90.98873591989988%
Multi-Core
4472
30.159158349069326%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |