Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 539 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €66.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76875 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1598
99.68808484092327%
Multi-Core
14828
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |