Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2266 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1840 - 424 vs 373 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
