Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 539 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 146 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
75.53628480146052%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
