Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 75 days newer than Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€279.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €279.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
99.81905910735827%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |