Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 3841 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-540 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 73 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i3-540
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Clarkdale |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 73 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
