Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 75 days newer than Core i3-10100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-10100 - 137 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
98.54014598540147%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€111.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €111.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
86.16314199395771%
Multi-Core
4215
28.911447973112008%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |