Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 1103 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 29% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 80 vs 62 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€223.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €223.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
60.3134110787172%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |