Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 1839 days newer than Core i5-6400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 23% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-6400 - 399 vs 324 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
399
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
66.9680530440024%
Multi-Core
3023
28.228592772434403%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
