Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 2998 days newer than Core i5-3450.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-3450 - 260 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 77 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 77 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
