Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 560 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 131 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 58 vs 280 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
124
94.65648854961832%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
74.56179775280899%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
