Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 1327 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 213 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 140 vs 280 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
