Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 697 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - €69.58 vs €4461.44
- Up to 98% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - €0.63 vs €40.56 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€40.56/FPS
1.5532544378698225%
Price, €
€4461.44
1%
Buy for €4,461.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4047 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1558
97.19276356830942%
Multi-Core
13904
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |