Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 1032 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600 - 131 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 99% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - €66.58 vs €4461.44
- Up to 98% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - €0.53 vs €34.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€34.06/FPS
1.5560775102759836%
Price, €
€4461.44
1%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,461.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
125
95.41984732824427%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1068
68.54942233632862%
Multi-Core
4578
32.92577675489068%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |