Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 2663 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6300 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 128 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 95 vs 280 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€32.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€4461.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €4,461.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |