Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 160 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - €185.02 vs €2439.63
- Up to 93% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - €1.16 vs €15.95 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
153
95%
Value, €/FPS
€15.95/FPS
7%
Price, €
€2439.63
7%
Buy for €2,439.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€185.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €185.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 506 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |