Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 216 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-9100F - 137 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€2339.63
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,339.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
83.98533007334963%
Multi-Core
3669
26.19217589948601%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |