Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-6100 - 200 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - €68.52 vs €2439.63
- Up to 97% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - €0.39 vs €12.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.2/FPS
3%
Price, €
€2439.63
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,439.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
176
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |