Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2185 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 97% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1820 - 193 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
98
50.77720207253886%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2790 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
30.012224938875303%
Multi-Core
825
5.889491719017704%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |