Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 5 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 8% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Athlon 3000G - 255 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - €80.0 vs €2339.63
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €2,339.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76753 minutes ago
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
58.49633251833741%
Multi-Core
1975
14.099086236436323%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |