Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €167.8 vs €1506.42
- Up to 89% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €0.6 vs €5.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.38/FPS
11%
Price, €
€1506.42
11%
Buy for €1,506.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 325 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €167.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |