Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 13% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-10400 - 60 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €129.68 vs €1506.42
- Up to 90% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €2.45 vs €25.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€25.11/FPS
9%
Price, €
€1506.42
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,506.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 558 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
53
88%
Value, €/FPS
€2.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 558 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |