Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2034 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 37% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1840 - 194 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
30.293941211757648%
Multi-Core
854
6.412855748291657%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
