Buy on Amazon
€106.72
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1399
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 239 days older than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 258 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
240
93.02325581395348%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.72
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Tray 60 Units
Buy for €106.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Single-Core
1452
87.10257948410319%
Multi-Core
4669
35.060449050086355%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
