Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 587 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 17% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3930 - 171 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
51.52542372881356%
Multi-Core
1043
14.443982827863177%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Colfax | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 250 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
