Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2170 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-4300 - 240 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 95 vs 250 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Colfax | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
