Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2227 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4130 - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-4130 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 4M 125W Sockel AM3+
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 76602 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Colfax | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.