Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1535 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4160T - 262 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
