Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 277 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €80.22 vs €309.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Control than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.4 vs €1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
25.974025974025977%
Price, €
€309.99
25%
Buy for €309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
88.54003139717426%
Multi-Core
3619
48.55111349610947%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Colfax | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |