Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €102.0 vs €819.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 344 vs 307 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
307
89.24418604651163%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€102
100%
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76948 minutes ago
Buy for €819 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76947 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
39.4754539340955%
Multi-Core
6976
34.62378399841175%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |