Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €62.24 vs €82.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.24 vs €0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
77.41935483870968%
Price, €
€82
75%
Buy for €82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €62.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
98.04088586030664%
Multi-Core
3254
46.64564220183486%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |