Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 160 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €194.6 vs €379.64
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.22 vs €2.53 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
150
93%
Value, €/FPS
€2.53/FPS
48%
Price, €
€379.64
51%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€194.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €194.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |