Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1069 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €102.0 vs €999.9
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 180 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 592 vs 530 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
530
89.52702702702703%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€102
100%
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76782 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
592
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€999.9
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €999.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76781 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
70.04773269689738%
Multi-Core
6976
56.47211203756173%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Whitehaven | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |