Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1279 days newer than Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 20% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-4460T - 104 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Single-Core
802
68.66438356164383%
Multi-Core
2190
37.797721781152916%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
