Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 75% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-3770 - 259 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €57.16 vs €839.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.39 vs €3.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 77 vs 120 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.24/FPS
12.037037037037036%
Price, €
€839
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
148
57.14285714285714%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€57.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €57.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
22.99520219328307%
Multi-Core
2299
11.709876228798452%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 77 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |