Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-11600K - 579 vs 473 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €204.84 vs €577.6
- Up to 57% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.43 vs €1.0 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €577.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
473
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€204.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €204.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |