Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2256 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 103% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320E - 474 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
474
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1012.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,012.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |