Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2992 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 65% better in Starfield than FX-4130 - 71 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €349.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |